Clear and Unmistakable Error (CUE) Claim Opinion
On August 17, 2012, The Federal Circuit issued an opinion in Hillyard v. Shinseki upholding the validity of limiting a claimant to one CUE motion on a prior final Board of Veteran Appeals decision. The decision can be accessed at http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/11-7157.pdf. CUE claims are an important vehicle for Veterans to address matters already subject to a...
State Veteran’s Benefits
In the course of speaking with Veterans, it is apparent that many Veterans are unaware of various State benefits available to them. In addition to federal benefits for Veterans, most states offer a variety of programs for Veterans and their families. These benefits include scholarships, vocational programs, tax exemptions, nursing home care for elderly and disabled Veterans, and more. The...
Medicaid rules enable some spouses to keep extra assets
Did you know that there is a way for low-income community spouses of Medicaid applicants to hold onto extra assets? We have had the opportunity in an array of cases over the years to obtain greater protection for such spouses. Ordinarily, the combined available marital assets must be “spent down” to a certain level before an application for Medicaid can be filed to pay for the...
Medicaid: post-eligibility income deductions for pre-existing medical expenses
E. R. vs DMAHS and Department of Health and Senior Services
OAL docket no. HMARP 09910-09, Final Agency Decision dated April 12, 2010.
In this case, attorney Lauren S. Marinaro secured a Post-Eligibility Medical Expense Income Deduction (PEME) for her client per 42 USC 1396a(r)(1)(A) to pay off the Medicaid recipient’s outstanding pre-eligibility assisted living health care...
P.K. vs Union County Board of Social Services and DMAHS
P.K. vs Union County Board of Social Services and DMAHS
OAL docket no. HMA7069-09N, Final Agency Decision issued March 4, 2010
Immediate, nonassignable, irrevocable IRA annuity, purchased by the community spouse during the spend-down period, naming the State of New Jersey as the 1st remainder beneficiary to the extent of Medicaid benefits paid for the institutionalized spouse, is not an...
Duffy vs Velez, (U.S. District Court)
Duffy vs Velez, (U.S. District Court)
Case no. 3:09-cv-05539-AET-LHG.
This was an action filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (the A.D.A.), (Westlaw citation is Duffy v. Velez, 2010 WL 503037, (D.N.J.,2010)) seeking an accommodation for the plaintiff, specifically, waiver of the income cap in the Global Options Medicaid Program so that Mr. Duffy could reside in assisted living...
Estate of M.M. vs Division of Medical Assistance & Health Services & Union County Board of Social Services
Estate of M.M. vs Division of Medical Assistance & Health Services & Union County Board of Social Services, OAL docket no. HMA 13911-08
Final Agency Decision May 2009 adopting the ALJ Initial Decision, reverses County Board’s action that penalized pre-eligibility transfers of assets and that denied eligibility on the basis that the Medicaid applicant wasn’t a resident of New Jersey at...
J.P. v. Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services
J.P. v. Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services, 392 N.J.Super. 295, 920 A.2d 707 (N.J.Super.A.D.,2007).
After a supplemental needs trust was created for a physically disabled wife and husband was ordered in divorce decree to pay $1550 per month in alimony to trust, county board of social services notified wife that the alimony would be considered income, for Medicaid purposes, to...
W.T. v. Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services
W.T. v. Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services, 391 N.J.Super. 25, 916 A.2d 1066 (N.J.Super.A.D.,2007).
Appeal was taken from final agency decision of the Department of Human Services Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services (DMAHS) upholding the assessment of a transfer penalty delaying the effective date of institutionalized applicant’s participation in Medicaid...
I/M/O Estate of Denner, Chancery Div.–Union Cy.
38-4-3076 I/M/O Estate of Denner, Chancery Div.–Union Cy. (Lyons, P.J.Ch.) (8 pp.) (Unpublished decision dated Feb. 28, 2006, Released Mar. 1, 2006.)
The plaintiff submitted three unsigned alternative documents which she claimed should be probated as writings intended to be a Will under the revised probate code, instead of the earlier Will that was probated by the defendant: (1) an...